By Jen Sidorova
Georgia’s largest public pension plans, the Employees’ Retirement System (ERS) and the Teachers Retirement System of Georgia (TRS), have seen a year of exceptionally high investment returns: 19.4% and 25.08% gains respectively.
This performance is in stark contrast with last year, when ERS had a negative 3.6% return (a loss) and TRS saw a modest 2.9% gain. The high returns are not unique to Georgia: Nationally, public pension plans have averaged investment returns of 27% for fiscal year 2021.
The high returns are great news for ERS, a multi-tier pension plan that enrolls all new employees to a hybrid defined-benefit (pension) and 401(k) plan. The structure of the hybrid benefit provides accountability and manages the burden that unfunded liabilities have on government budgets and taxpayers. According to the latest reporting, ERS now has $2.3 billion in unfunded liabilities and is 87.6% funded, a significant improvement from the previous year, when it was $4.2 billion in unfunded liabilities and just 76.2% funded.
Strong investment returns are great news for Georgia’s teachers as well, but will hardly be the long-awaited salvation for TRS, which is the pension plan serving the state’s educators. As pointed out in a previous analysis, the teacher retirement plan faces several significant challenges that will require more than a single year of great investment returns to fix.
Going forward, it should not be assumed that Georgia’s pension plans’ high returns will continue. Experts predict the average investment return for public pensions over the next few decades is more likely to be less than TRS’ current target of 7.25%. Regardless of the high investment returns now, TRS should quickly lower this investment return assumption, which is above the national average of 7.0%. One year of excellent returns will not change the fact that TRS is most likely underestimating its unfunded liabilities.
Before the pandemic, there was discussion of possible reforms of the TRS. Among the proposals discussed were lowering assumed investment return assumptions, shortening the amortization schedule, and creating a new benefit tier.
The Pension Integrity Project at Reason Foundation pointed out that lowering the return assumption can improve the system’s ability to keep promises by reducing the risk of insolvency and improving the long-term predictability of contribution rates. Shortening the time frame to pay off pension debt, in turn, can reduce the total long-term cost of the pension system. Creating a new benefit tier would not result in any changes to the benefits of current participants or increase state contributions, and it could lower the overall risk of plans’ underperformance.
A single year – or even several years – of exceptionally high investment returns would be welcome news for TRS. Even a streak of high returns, however, will not change the harsh truth that this and many other plans still face significant funding risks going forward.
Georgia policymakers need to address these risks to protect taxpayers, employees and retirees. Absent meaningful reform to reduce financial risk and improve solvency of the teacher plan, the state will be increasingly unable to afford to invest in other public priorities, such as K-12 education and infrastructure repairs.
Jen Sidorova, a policy analyst with Reason Foundation’s Pension Integrity Project, wrote this commentary for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation.
Established in 1991, the Georgia Public Policy Foundation is a trusted, independent resource for voters and elected officials. The Foundation provides actionable solutions to real-life problems by bringing people together. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the U.S. Congress or the Georgia Legislature.
© Georgia Public Policy Foundation (October 29, 2021). Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author and her affiliations are cited.