By Benita M. Dodd
Georgia legislators get lots of input on lawmaking and good policy. The Georgia Public Policy Foundation provides legislators with a “Guide to the Issues.” After every election year, the Biennial Institute at UGA’s Carl Vinson Institute offers “an orientation to the legislative process for new lawmakers and timely policy sessions for all attendees.”
So how do laws happen? According to the Senate, “A need for a new law or change in existing law is recognized by legislator, or suggested by the Governor, public agency, a constituent, or others.” A General Assembly website summarizes: “Legislator sees need for a new law or changes in existing law and decides to introduce a bill.”
Despite the expectations of educated, accountable and responsible lawmaking, however, Georgians often see questionable legislation become law. They also see legislation considered good – or at least, harmless – blocked, leaving many scratching their heads as to what’s happening under the Gold Dome.
Three recent examples:
What’s the common thread? It’s explained in the title of a new book from the Institute for Justice: “Bottleneckers: Gaming the Government for Power and Private Profit.” (Encounter Books, $27.99). Written by William Mellor and Dick Carpenter, the book describes a “bottlenecker” as “anyone who uses government power to limit competition and thereby reap monopoly profits and other benefits.”
“Bottleneckers work with politicians to constrict competition, entrepreneurial innovation and opportunity. They thereby limit consumer choice; drive up consumer prices, and they support politicians who willingly overstep the constitutional limits of their powers to create, maintain and expand these anticompetitive bottlenecks,” the book explains.
In an interesting tie to Georgia’s craft brewery direct-sale difficulties, “bottleneckers” got their name from the post-Prohibition, alcohol-distribution industry, where all liquor sales must flow through distributors as middleman. (To retail your product, you require a distributor.)
The book also cites Georgia’s egregious, expensive occupational licensing law for music therapists. Requirements include a bachelor’s degree in music therapy approved by the American Music Therapy Association, which lobbied for the law. It requires 1,200 hours of clinical training, 180 hours of pre-internship experiences and 900 hours of internship experience. The upshot of these onerous requirements: fewer therapists and higher costs to Georgians.
Bottlenecking is not just big companies shutting out smaller companies. It’s professionals blocking entry to newcomers through government-imposed occupational licenses. It’s restaurants seeking restrictive zoning and licensing for food trucks, which then trickles down to a child’s lemonade stand. It’s casket sellers and taxi companies protecting their turf.
In every case, the heavy, arbitrary hand of government wields power unjustly to protect special interests while jobs, innovation, entrepreneurship and opportunity are “bottlenecked,” becoming casualties. No matter where it happens, it’s bad governance, bad economics and disrespectful of citizens. And it must be stopped.
Carpenter, director of strategic research at the Institute for Justice and a professor at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, is the keynote speaker for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation’s February 22 Leadership Breakfast, where he will discuss the book. Register here.
Benita Dodd is vice president of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, an independent think tank that proposes market-oriented approaches to public policy to improve the lives of Georgians. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the view of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the U.S. Congress or the Georgia Legislature.
© Georgia Public Policy Foundation (February 17, 2017). Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author and her affiliations are cited.
The Georgia Public Policy Foundation has been doing important work for the free enterprise movement for the past 20 years. I can assure you from the vantage of a non-profit think tank in Washington, D.C. with much the same principles as GPPF that the work we do simply would not be possible if it were not for the important work that GPPF does. We see it, we understand it, it is an inspiration to us, it is the kind of thing that will translate into the important work that we can do in Washington, D.C. We thank you very much for that.