Nuclear Power Can Balance Energy Demand

January 23rd, 2014 by 1 Comment

Despite America’s abundance of natural gas from shale production, some parts of the country have already had warnings that over-dependence on gas for electricity generation exposes consumers to soaring prices for electricity, writes Mark Perry in the Investor’s Business Daily of January 16, 2014.

The problem is the declining use of coal and nuclear power, the two sources of electricity that provide the greatest price stability and serve as a hedge against wide fluctuations in gas prices, according to Perry, a professor of economics at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan and a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Among his comments:

For the power industry to become increasingly dependent on a fuel with a history of price volatility could be problematic. Nationally, since 1995, the United States has built 342,000 megawatts of gas-fired power capacity, approximately 75% of all capacity additions. But coal and nuclear power account for only 6% of the total.

Long-term energy fundamentals support continued reliance on and expansion of nuclear power.

Nuclear plants supply large amounts of carbon-free energy around the clock, safely and reliably. Nuclear plants provide forward price stability and are not subject to the volatility of natural gas prices. And they contribute to the fuel and technology diversity that is the bedrock of a resilient electric sector.

These are among the economic and environmental values of nuclear power, but they are values that the public does not recognize. A nuclear plant is an asset with a 60-year lifetime that is carbon-free and doesn’t pollute the air. And, unlike solar and wind power, it is always on.

For the better part of a half-century, America has benefitted from a balanced energy program that has included nuclear power. Today our energy system is the world’s best, but that doesn’t mean we can let up.

For clean base-load power, we will need nuclear energy. And that’s why it’s important to craft policies that open up private investment in new nuclear plants. Georgia’s Plant Vogtle is currently undergoing an expansion, adding two reactors. Read Benita Dodd’s 2012 commentary, “Don’t hide energy innovation under a bushel.”

One thought on “Nuclear Power Can Balance Energy Demand

  1. There are many complaints about the high cost of nuclear power. Plant Vogtle may end up costing $8000 per kilowatt.

    One factor that seems to be ignored is the 60- year lifetime of nuclear plants and their operating efficiency that produces capacity factors of 0.9, This means a 1 kilowatt nuclear plant will produce 8000 kilowatt-hours annually and 480,000 kilowatt-hours over a plant’s lifetime. On a simplistic basis, this means capital costs amount to 1.7 cents per kilowatt-hour.

    Due to far shorter lifetimes and capacity factors for renewable energy sources (like 25-year lifetimes and 0.3 and 0.18 capacity factors for wind and solar), the simplistic cost of capital for generated electricity is far more expensive.

    James H. Rust, Policy Advisor The Heartland Institute

Leave a Reply to James Rust Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Georgia Public Policy Foundation is something that I am proud to be a part of today. The research conducted by education groups like yours is invaluable in helping form opinions and allowing people to reach conclusions that ultimately help them make the right decisions.

Dan Amos, CEO, AFLAC more quotes